Federal Agents Are Killing Americans While the White House Posts Neo-Nazi Anthems

Thomas Paine, the revolutionary pamphleteer whose words ignited a nation’s conscience, once wrote: “In free countries, the law ought to be king; and there ought to be no other.” Today, as federal immigration enforcement operates with deadly consequences and official government accounts broadcast extremist symbolism, Americans must ask whether the law still reigns, or whether something far more sinister has seized the throne.

Independent journalism has never been more critical. As corporate media normalizes the abnormal and looks away from inconvenient truths, reader-supported outlets like Raw American remain free to speak plainly about threats to democracy. Please subscribe today to help keep this work going.

According to Reuters, the administration’s recent reshuffling of immigration enforcement leadership reveals what happens when aggressive policy meets operational reality. Gregory Bovino, the border patrol commander who became the public face of the Minneapolis immigration crackdown, is expected to leave the city following a second fatal shooting of an American citizen by federal agents. The 55-year-old has been stripped of his specially created title of “commander at large” and will return to his former position as chief patrol agent along California’s El Centro sector.

Bovino’s departure comes amid a sharp shift in White House strategy after the fatal shooting of Alex Pretti, a 37-year-old ICU nurse. President Trump announced he was sending Tom Homan, his “border czar,” to Minnesota to oversee operations on the ground, nicknamed Operation Metro Surge, reporting directly to the president. Earlier, Trump held what he described as conciliatory calls with Minnesota Governor Tim Walz and Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey, Democrats he had previously blamed for turmoil that escalated into two killings of U.S. citizens by federal agents.

Yet Bovino’s demotion should not distract from the fundamental truth: he is merely an operative implementing a vision conceived and directed by others. Stephen Miller and Donald Trump remain the architects of this immigration crackdown, the brains behind policies that have now resulted in American deaths on American soil. When commanders are shuffled and strategies shift, the architects remain, drawing new plans from the same authoritarian blueprint.

The operational brutality finds its complement in something equally disturbing: a systematic pattern of government communication that speaks in extremist codes. According to The New York Times, the White House, Department of Homeland Security, and Department of Labor have posted content steeped in white supremacist imagery and extremist symbolism. These are not fringe actors operating in society’s shadows. These are official government accounts, speaking with the authority of the American state.

This month, the White House and Homeland Security jointly posted an ICE recruitment advertisement overlaid with the words “WE’LL HAVE OUR HOME AGAIN.” The phrase is the title of a song written by members of a self-described “pro-White fraternal order” and embraced by white-nationalist groups. When The Times opened the Instagram post on mobile, audio from the song’s chorus played in the background. Homeland Security spokeswoman Tricia McLaughlin initially denied the connection before dismissing the evidence as a “left-wing conspiracy theory.” Less than 40 minutes later, the Instagram post vanished.

The pattern extends beyond one deleted post. As Trump escalated his campaign to seize Greenland, the White House posted an image captioned “Which way, Greenland man?” echoing “Which Way Western Man?”—a book that white-supremacist groups treat as foundational text. The Labor Department posted imagery with “TRUST THE PLAN,” a QAnon catchphrase, and “One Homeland. One People. One Heritage,” resembling the Nazi slogan “Ein Volk, Ein Reich, Ein Führer.” On New Year’s Eve, the White House posted Trump alongside the word “remigration,” a European concept centered on expelling nonwhite people that tens of thousands of Germans protested when their far-right party proposed it.

“When you add it all together,” William Braniff, director of the Polarization and Extremism Research and Innovation Lab at American University, told The Times, “it’s much harder to dismiss.” Jessie Daniels, a sociologist who has studied online extremism for thirty years, was even more direct: “These people used to be in the dark corners of the internet. Now, they are holding public office.”

The question before the nation is stark: will Americans accept federal agents killing nurses in American cities while government accounts broadcast extremist signals? Or will they remember Paine’s revolutionary wisdom and demand that law, not authoritarianism cloaked in operational reshuffling and plausible deniability, remain king? The answer will determine whether liberty or tyranny defines this moment in American history.